Insitu Debuts ScanEagle3 at Xponential 2018


Insitu Debuts ScanEagle3 at Xponential 2018


Insitu Debuts ScanEagle3 at Xponential 2018


MENU menu icon search icon


What we’re about

Unmanned Systems have challenged the notion of “possible” since the industry was born circa World War I. Like our agile industry, Insitu has changed and grown constantly since our inception in the early 1990s. Though we have outgrown the garage from which our first UAVs were produced, our passionate team strives to embody the original entrepreneurial spirit, ethics and vision that our founders established two decades ago and continue to drive our innovation and vitality today and onward.

We empower our global customers to make the best, most informed decisions possible. We do this by creating industry-leading integrated systems that collect, process and distribute information for decision-makers.

Team Insitu is driven by four pillars.


Our pioneering spirit is derived from a genuine passion for what we do and an intention to remain at the forefront of change in this dynamic industry, constantly raising the standards and pushing the boundaries. For our blog, this pillar represents leading technology developments that drive the Unmanned Systems industry.


This category encompasses industry developments that inspire and challenge our team to deliver the most effective and efficient solutions possible, and pivot quickly when our customers need us to.


Our team stands together, made only stronger by our diversity in thought and location. This synergy encompasses not only those within our company, but also our customers, aviation regulators, industry thought-leaders, and countless others whose contributions collectively and constantly drive us to think bigger.


As a global company, we are fortunate to be a part of many diverse communities. Some of these communities revolve around where we are, while others are inherent to what we do. Regardless of how we relate, Team Insitu values and supports each community member, and embraces the uniqueness that each one brings to our culture and industry.



Opinions expressed in blog articles and in any corresponding comments are the views and opinions of the original authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Insitu Inc. or The Boeing Company as a whole. All Insitu names, copyrights and trademarks are the property of Insitu Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.


Photos, charts and any other graphics featured in Insitu’s blog are not for commercial use. Members of the media who desire high-resolution photos of Insitu’s products should submit an Image Request Form.

Comment Policy

We welcome your comments and feedback on our articles. All comments are, however, moderated and may not appear immediately. Offensive or off-topic comments will not be featured. Any comments submitted by anonymous users will not be made public. We will not treat any comments you submit as confidential information. Please do not submit comments that contain any confidential information belonging to anyone else.

By submitting a comment to Onward, you agree to our website Terms and Conditions and to having your name displayed with your comment. All or part of your comment may be posted or cited in the blog. Your name and personal information will not be used for any other purpose, and we will not publish your e-mail address.


3D Aerial Survey Technologies: Which tool to use, and when to use it

By John Leipper, Insitu Solutions Architect

Surveyors have no shortage of tools at their disposal to aid their land survey activities, such as construction layout and control, earthwork and volume survey, utility mapping, and topographic mapping for engineering design, to name a few. By leveraging advances in GPS and laser scanning, terrestrial-based survey equipment has improved not only the positional accuracy of measurements, but also the sheer number of measurements obtained.

While ground equipment has improved the efficiency of surveyors to survey more area in less time, larger projects still benefit from airborne 3D survey technologies, such as photogrammetry and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). Insitu has compared the benefits of these airborne 3D survey technologies and their applications in traditional survey use cases. Today, I’ll share insight on how to determine which tool will provide the most value in specific use cases. For a more comprehensive look at our observations and conclusions on this topic, I invite you to follow the link at the bottom of this article to read the complete white paper.

Use Cases and Trade-offs

Admittedly, there are benefits and shortcomings when it comes to LiDAR and photogrammetry that need to be considered when choosing a technology for a particular use case. Through our extensive experience performing 3D aerial survey for our customers, we’ve established some general guidelines on when to use one technology over another.


  • Better for fine details, especially linear surveying, such as powerlines and train tracks.
  • Environmental operational considerations are mainly tied to the reflectivity of the surface being scanned and visibility on the day of operation. LiDAR can operate day or night, over water, in partly cloudy conditions, and in feature-free environments. Smog and highly matte finishes (e.g., dry snow) adversely affect LiDAR performance.
  • Better for broad areas and scalability due to relatively low amount of data created. One platform can survey many sites in a single mission.
  • Faster processing time. Raw point cloud available in near real time.
  • Accuracy with minimal calibration overhead
  • Generally heavier and more expensive, requiring a larger platform (~ 5.5kg) for LiDAR ranges which are compatible with fixed-wing platforms. Smaller 2 kg systems are only suitable on multirotor platforms with current technology.
  • Higher cost, but lower overheads (like computing power, size of data involved, processing time)
  • Altitude capped on LiDAR range (currently typically to <2,000ft AGL on a LiDAR small enough for a 55 lb. UAV).
  • Needs airborne camera alongside to “colorize”


  • Better for open, “bare earth” survey. Reflections and trees adversely affect result and number of artifacts.
  • Environmental operational considerations include shadows (especially changing shadows through-out a mission), amount of sunlight, shadows from clouds, and reflective or feature-free (e.g., bodies of water) inclusions in data.
  • Better for smaller specific areas (around 5-7 square km) to keep post-processing time to within 24 hours and amount of data to transfer acceptable (e.g., transfer of data to cloud or customer).
  • Better point cloud density if you don’t need the data in a rapid fashion. Also able to choose a desired density when rendering a result.
  • High accuracy (<1.0m) comes with logistics overhead (as large number of Ground Control Points are required). >1 meter accuracy without GCPs, or RTK GPS
  • Generally lighter, can be carried on more platforms (~2 kg)
  • Lower cost but higher overhead
  • Larger operational envelope with fewer restrictions on altitude and ability to size cameras and lenses to the appropriate capture geometry.
  • Output model inherently colorized

Additional Considerations

Of course the trades discussed above aren’t exhaustive, but provide a glimpse of the trade-offs we consider when choosing a sensor and platform combination that answers a customer’s need. Additional aspects that we consider when evaluating a use case include:

  • How quickly is the data needed? (For example, for live dig-planning, emergency response, etc.).
  • Are there environmental considerations that favor one payload over the other for a given site? (Are there large bodies of water? Is it a smoggy environment?
  • Do mid-day operations suit the customer? (This is a scalability challenge for photogrammetry.)
  • Is a high-bandwidth internet connection or powerful PC available on site?
  • Do you have high accuracy needs? (If the use case involves volume measurements, then photogrammetry might be “good enough.”)
  • Will the customer allow GCPs within their site? (Many sites in Australia are moving away from people in the site and they do not accept GCPs as standard practice, favoring LiDAR.)
  • Is radio Line of Sight (LOS) an issue? Many sites can have large sand hills surrounding deep mines, meaning LOS can be challenging at LiDAR altitudes; thus photogrammetry survey from higher altitudes is favored.
  • Will the aerial survey “scale up” over the life of site operations? (LiDAR will scale more readily than photogrammetry due to sunlight, shadow growth and big data constraints.)

From our experience, our customers tend to want high accuracy for their use cases, and will not tolerate GCPs on their sites. This starts to make the case for LiDAR favorable, yet there are many customer use cases for which this won’t be the case. Through collaborations with our customers, we help identify the proper 3D tool that is appropriately sized for the job at hand.

Stay Tuned

We at Insitu understand the benefit of 3D data collections at a large scale and are constantly working to advance the state-of-the art of planning, collection, analysis, and distribution of aerial data. Soon we’ll unveil details of our wide-area survey capability, which will help users gain insight into physical assets covering large geographic regions. Together with our customers, we’re working to improve the efficiency of existing asset management workflows and wide-area 3D survey is one tool in our aerial survey toolbox.

Get the full white paper here

Click for more Click for more

Stay in the loop with Insitu.

Enter your email address below to get notified about the latest blog entries.

Email Address

Please enter a valid email address

You're almost done.

To complete your subscription, check your inbox for an email from us.
(If you don’t see it, take a look in your spam folder.)


You're all set.

Thank you for confirming your email address.
You are now subscribed to the Insitu blog.

Read The Latest Blog Entry

Unsubscribe Successful.

You will no longer receive email marketing from this list.



We're sorry to see you go! Enter your email address to unsubscribe from this list.

Email Address

Please enter a valid email address